One brief in plain English — skills, client context, and spend guardrails already loaded. A full funnel and a full site come back in minutes, and the tenth costs about what the first did.
Two ways to grow a studio today. Both cost you time, money, or your edge.
You shoot, edit, post, write the emails, run the ads, wrestle the website — and marketing is the first thing to slip. There's one of you, and the day runs out.
Weeks to see a draft. A retainer that stings. You're one account of forty — and they've never shot a session in their life.
Built for your studio, in a day, at a fraction of the cost — not your evenings, not a five-figure retainer, not a chatbot that forgets you by Tuesday.
You describe the work. A team of agents — already loaded with your brand, your offer, and the agency's best playbooks — ships it.
If that sounds like your team, you're not behind — almost no one is running this yet. It's software that runs locally and rewrites its own workflows for each client.
Every app is a finished set of paths. The moment you need one it doesn't have, you're filing a feature request and waiting on a release. An agent framework composes from skills it already has — and writes new ones when it doesn't. No roadmap to wait on, no front-end to click through.
The skills are already built — so you command the outcome, no re-briefing it for the hundredth time.
No dashboard to learn. You ask in plain words; what comes back has already cleared schema checks and a manager's review.
Say what you need, in plain words.
It loads the right skills, playbooks, and context.
Copy, site, ads, and email — made in parallel.
Finished work reaches you, spend gated.
It deploys and syncs to the whole team.
From scratch, in minutes — every asset generated in parallel, optimized for Google search and for AI answer engines.
llms.txt + an on-site MCP, so AI answer engines quote your client, not just Google.Every launch is a test. When a test costs minutes instead of months, you run ten before a slow team ships its first draft — and you find the winning formula first.
Every operator runs Claude Code or Codex against one repo. GitHub keeps the whole team in lockstep. No central app to bottleneck — or break.
One repo on every laptop, in sync — and it grows itself as agents commit new skills.
Connect it once; the whole team plugs in. Slack, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, your CRM — and anything with an API.
Each tool connects through one approved path — no shared passwords, full audit trail, everyone benefits.
A lightweight worker server brings the Google Ads API in through MCP — so agents build live campaigns with every dollar of spend gated behind a manager.
Ad spend, production deploys, and provider writes always wait behind a manager's approval.
Connect it once, gate it by role, and let the agents act.
Briefs, research, strategy, copy, ads, handoffs — the same trusted folder for each studio.
clients/**Composed workflows and distilled playbooks the whole team draws from.
.claude/skillsFull Next.js builds — only spun up when a client needs one.
sites/*Identity, curated knowledge, the gated provider ledger, Slack digests, and Drive sync — the engine room behind the lanes.
apps/agency-osOwners, branch + edit guards, path-aware checks.
.github · .githooksStructured output is demanded, not requested. Every result passes quality checks, clears human and manager review, and answers to guardrails set per person. Nothing ships on trust alone.
Some people need a checkpoint. Some don't. You decide who.
A task that took 45 minutes on run one takes 15 by run ten. Every pass updates the skills, hooks, and workflows the next person picks up — and it all syncs to GitHub, so the whole team inherits the gain.
Nobody starts from scratch. Everyone starts from everyone's best run.
From buried in it — or overpaying an agency — → a full launch, shipped in a session.
Soon every studio will run a system like this — or hire an agency that does. Bring one brief and watch yours get built, before you commit to anything. Your competitors aren't running this yet.
Rather build it yourself? Start with Claude Code + Codex. · On the team? Onboard onto Agency OS →
Access is role-scoped: client facts stay client-scoped, drafts and source material never leave authenticated tools, and no provider write or ad-spend change happens without a human-approved review.
Always. People review and approve the work — you decide which steps need a checkpoint and which don't. Agents draft and build; humans own the call.
Every output is schema-checked, passes a quality gate, and clears human and manager review before it ships. Nothing reaches a client on trust alone.
It runs on a flat Claude Code / Codex subscription, not metered API — so the tenth build for a client costs about what the first did. Cost doesn't scale with how much you make.
It's built on photography-studio playbooks — boudoir, portrait, and beyond — and the agents adapt to your brand, voice, offer, and audience from your own intake and reviews.
No. You ask in plain language. There's no dashboard to learn and no front-end to click through — you review finished work and approve what ships.
Connect them once — Slack, Gmail, Drive, Calendar, your CRM, anything with an API — and the whole team plugs into the same gated, audited path.
Bring one brief to a live build session and watch a full launch come together before you commit to anything.